<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 10 Quick Facts About Google+</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/10-quick-facts-about-google/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/10-quick-facts-about-google/</link>
	<description>Exploring Digital Trends and Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: textureweb</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/10-quick-facts-about-google/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[textureweb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 23:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=432#comment-119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One response to this was:
&quot;The heart of your writing while sounding agreeable initially, did not really settle well with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I still have a problem with your leaps in logic and one might do well to fill in all those gaps. If you can accomplish that, I will surely end up being fascinated.&quot;

To that poster - I am not sure SEO where my writing and logic come into play here on this article - it is a post of info from another content provider. I am not approving the original post, because - as a lesson to the rest - this ambigous post is to me 98% spam. Why? No mention of the content, the disagreement was about my logic which in this case was not present at all, and the all to keyword phrased content.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One response to this was:<br />
&#8220;The heart of your writing while sounding agreeable initially, did not really settle well with me personally after some time. Someplace throughout the paragraphs you managed to make me a believer unfortunately just for a short while. I still have a problem with your leaps in logic and one might do well to fill in all those gaps. If you can accomplish that, I will surely end up being fascinated.&#8221;</p>
<p>To that poster &#8211; I am not sure SEO where my writing and logic come into play here on this article &#8211; it is a post of info from another content provider. I am not approving the original post, because &#8211; as a lesson to the rest &#8211; this ambigous post is to me 98% spam. Why? No mention of the content, the disagreement was about my logic which in this case was not present at all, and the all to keyword phrased content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: textureweb</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/10-quick-facts-about-google/comment-page-1/#comment-113</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[textureweb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:33:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=432#comment-113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your best bet is to pick your key words and integrate them into your blog title, article titles, copy deck and alternative text for images. If you are using an open platform like Word Press, don&#039;t be hung up on the meta tags for key words.

You can use a tool such as the density tool - link below - (you want to be between 5-7% range). A good linking strategy, integration of social plugins and getting activity such as posting responses are all important. Keywords not so much these days unless you are buying them with AdWords - in that case its not about the SEO of the page, but your bank account.

&quot;Search engines may place significant weight on domain age, site authority, link anchor text and usage data.&quot; - http://tools.seobook.com/general/keyword-density/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your best bet is to pick your key words and integrate them into your blog title, article titles, copy deck and alternative text for images. If you are using an open platform like Word Press, don&#8217;t be hung up on the meta tags for key words.</p>
<p>You can use a tool such as the density tool &#8211; link below &#8211; (you want to be between 5-7% range). A good linking strategy, integration of social plugins and getting activity such as posting responses are all important. Keywords not so much these days unless you are buying them with AdWords &#8211; in that case its not about the SEO of the page, but your bank account.</p>
<p>&#8220;Search engines may place significant weight on domain age, site authority, link anchor text and usage data.&#8221; &#8211; <a href="http://tools.seobook.com/general/keyword-density/" rel="nofollow">http://tools.seobook.com/general/keyword-density/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dennis</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/10-quick-facts-about-google/comment-page-1/#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dennis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 07:49:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=432#comment-105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[gday
great site]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gday<br />
great site</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
