<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: YouTube moves beyond being a Web 2.0 Portal</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/youtube-moves-beyond-being-a-web2-0-portal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/youtube-moves-beyond-being-a-web2-0-portal/</link>
	<description>Exploring Digital Trends and Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: textureweb</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/youtube-moves-beyond-being-a-web2-0-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-11</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[textureweb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Jan 2012 05:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=166#comment-11</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hey Lenny. The recent changes I talked about were more about the function rather than the availability. Yeah we could have done private only on video&#039;s, but the new release allows for an easier way to manage, distribute and collate your content.

You are so right that YT did define what Web2.0 was all about. As for the buzz about Web3.0 I have to ask is it not really Web 2.156ex? No Really Web 3.0 will not be in gear for another 5 years in my opinion. It has to be something that we cannot imagine at this point. 

We are as far away from Web 3.0 as we were from 2.0 in 98. Those that disagree are just in a hurry to label shit.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Lenny. The recent changes I talked about were more about the function rather than the availability. Yeah we could have done private only on video&#8217;s, but the new release allows for an easier way to manage, distribute and collate your content.</p>
<p>You are so right that YT did define what Web2.0 was all about. As for the buzz about Web3.0 I have to ask is it not really Web 2.156ex? No Really Web 3.0 will not be in gear for another 5 years in my opinion. It has to be something that we cannot imagine at this point. </p>
<p>We are as far away from Web 3.0 as we were from 2.0 in 98. Those that disagree are just in a hurry to label shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lenny</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/01/youtube-moves-beyond-being-a-web2-0-portal/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lenny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 23:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=166#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A lot of those *recent changes* you mentioned aren&#039;t that recent. YouTube has been a social platform for quite some time. I think there are enhancements and further integrations that they&#039;re working on that will continue to grow it&#039;s social aspects. But YouTube defined 2.0 and now the buzz word is 3.0... what does that mean?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A lot of those *recent changes* you mentioned aren&#8217;t that recent. YouTube has been a social platform for quite some time. I think there are enhancements and further integrations that they&#8217;re working on that will continue to grow it&#8217;s social aspects. But YouTube defined 2.0 and now the buzz word is 3.0&#8230; what does that mean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
