<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Halifax Metro Centre &#8211; Welcome to the 1980s</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.textureweb.com/2014/05/halifax-metro-centre-welcome-to-the-1980s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2014/05/halifax-metro-centre-welcome-to-the-1980s/</link>
	<description>Exploring Digital Trends and Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Sep 2014 20:48:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2014/05/halifax-metro-centre-welcome-to-the-1980s/comment-page-1/#comment-961</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Grant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2014 18:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=3700#comment-961</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It certainly sounded like your wife was singled out to make a point! It was rude and does not help anything except his ego.

Off topic a bit:
The days of hiding a SLR in your boot or purse are gone when attending concerts, now that almost everyone carries a smartphone/camera. However, smartphones take pretty awful and indistinguishable images anyway, so why bother. I&#039;ve stopped. Unless you&#039;re a keener in the front row, the image quality is just not worth keeping or even sharing for that matter. If it&#039;s about sharing an image on a social site, I would rather post a few complimentary words of praise about the artist rather than upload a crappy picture.

My advice: Take binoculars for the up close &#039;memory&#039; shots. (Memory in your head, not memory in your phone) Not enough people take binoculars. By doing this and listening to the music, it will be more enjoyable with a sharper visual memory. It&#039;s more effective, than trying to convince your smartphone to create Rolling Stone quality images.

And yes, I walked out of the Gordon Lightfoot concert. Different reason and topic. ;-P]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It certainly sounded like your wife was singled out to make a point! It was rude and does not help anything except his ego.</p>
<p>Off topic a bit:<br />
The days of hiding a SLR in your boot or purse are gone when attending concerts, now that almost everyone carries a smartphone/camera. However, smartphones take pretty awful and indistinguishable images anyway, so why bother. I&#8217;ve stopped. Unless you&#8217;re a keener in the front row, the image quality is just not worth keeping or even sharing for that matter. If it&#8217;s about sharing an image on a social site, I would rather post a few complimentary words of praise about the artist rather than upload a crappy picture.</p>
<p>My advice: Take binoculars for the up close &#8216;memory&#8217; shots. (Memory in your head, not memory in your phone) Not enough people take binoculars. By doing this and listening to the music, it will be more enjoyable with a sharper visual memory. It&#8217;s more effective, than trying to convince your smartphone to create Rolling Stone quality images.</p>
<p>And yes, I walked out of the Gordon Lightfoot concert. Different reason and topic. ;-P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
