<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lack of a Better Word &#187; Flash</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.textureweb.com/tag/flash/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.textureweb.com</link>
	<description>Exploring Digital Trends and Issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2015 03:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=4.0.38</generator>
	<item>
		<title>You Will Get What You Pay For. Shit.</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/06/you-will-get-what-you-pay-for-shit/</link>
		<comments>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/06/you-will-get-what-you-pay-for-shit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jun 2012 09:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[textureweb]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=1656</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I came across an ad on Kijiji from the local health authority that was basically asking for free work entitled &#8220;Seeking volunteer with Adobe Flash experience to build animation&#8221; The ad claimed that &#8220;There should be no advanced programming or animation required.&#8221; The problem was, was that the work asked for was to be built in Flash and would be<br /><span class="read_more"><a href="https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/06/you-will-get-what-you-pay-for-shit/">Read more...</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/06/you-will-get-what-you-pay-for-shit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HTML5 versus Adobe Flash (infographic)</title>
		<link>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/03/html5-versus-adobe-flash-infographic/</link>
		<comments>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/03/html5-versus-adobe-flash-infographic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 11:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[textureweb]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Adobe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Development]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Flash]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HTML5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jquery]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.textureweb.com/?p=1034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last year Jobs had Apple positioning HTML5 as the new replacement for Adobe&#8217;s Flash. Since then the debate about the two has heated up with many developers backing either but rarely both. Flash based gaming developer Onemorelevel has developed the following infographic &#8211; already in itself causing some debate as to the apples to oranges comparison. An interesting point I<br /><span class="read_more"><a href="https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/03/html5-versus-adobe-flash-infographic/">Read more...</a></span>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.textureweb.com/2012/03/html5-versus-adobe-flash-infographic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
